Sub Criteria

Example of Evidence

2.1 Perspectives from all collaborators are incorporated in the collaboration and this is reflected in implementation plans, management and leadership structures.

Narrative description of the kinds of design elements included in the collaboration to assure mutual perspectives. Identify differences among the collaborators and how barriers are addressed. This can include how transparent conversations about power, privilege and position are part of the collaboration.

2.2 The collaborators actively engage in processes to understand each other’s cultural contexts and acknowledge the role of cultural influences on decision-making, responsibilities and leadership. 

Narrative description of how trust is built among the collaborators by genuine attempts to understand cultural influences.

2.3 The collaborators openly explore and document any imbalances of power, including perceived or potential imbalances while ensuring that expectations are met from each partner institutions.

Description of the issues that were considered and measures put in place to address any issues that may arise. May add a reflection on whether such issues arose during the collaboration and how they were addressed while maintaining meeting expectations and mutual benefits to both sides. One may conclude with lessons learned and recommendations for future collaborations.