Sub Criteria

Example of Evidence

3.1 Recruitment, promotion and employment statuses support individuals who participate in collaborative group activities

Narrative that describes how committees will consider educational, research, authorship and journals in publications from collaborative activities and groups, as well as those from individuals. Indicate how the institutional perspective supports the leadership involved in collaborations.

3.2 Commitment to the collaboration is valued and rewarded – ‘reward’ being a wider definition than simply monetary

Narrative of indications of commitment valued across partners as well as the types of recognition given to the collaboration/collaborators. Mechanisms to generate support from the wider leadership of collaborating entities, for example but not limited to, aligning with institutional strategic priorities.