Sub Criteria

Example of Evidence

5.1. The collaboration engages in ongoing and systematic evaluation of outcomes and process.

This can be supported by describing the evaluation framework that was employed by to assess the impact/outcomes of the collaboration.  

You may place this in an appendix if it exceeds the word count for Criterion 5.

5.2. The collaborators advance collaboration nationally and internationally through consultations, presentations and/or publication.

Lists of scholarly activities and publications related to the collaboration in the past five years can be included. List of awards, invitations to speak and consultations (e.g., to assist other institutions with collaboration and/or to be a collaborator) locally, nationally, and internationally in the past five years. 

You may place this list in an appendix if it exceeds the word count for Criterion 5.